REVIEW: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

prideandprejudicePride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
Kindle version, first published 1813

“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.”

So begins Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen’s witty comedy of manners–one of the most popular novels of all time–that features splendidly civilized sparring between the proud Mr. Darcy and the prejudiced Elizabeth Bennet as they play out their spirited courtship in a series of eighteenth-century drawing-room intrigues. Renowned literary critic and historian George Saintsbury in 1894 declared it the “most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author’s works,” and Eudora Welty in the twntieth century described it as “irresistible and as nearly flawless as any fiction could be.”


Admittedly, I was probably the last person on the planet to read this. I have seen the film version with Keira Knightley (and also don’t live under a rock), so was familiar with the storyline and how it would all turn out in the end. I think that, in the case of this particular story, seeing the film first was a disadvantage, because my one constant thought throughout reading the book was “okay, okay, hurry up and get to x part!” I felt like the story really dragged in some places, and wasn’t actually as charmed by Mr. Darcy or Elizabeth herself as I think everyone else was. I realize that this makes me a major black sheep, so obviously your mileage may vary! I do want to say that I DID like this book. I just didn’t love it.

First off, let me get some technical stuff out of the way. The version of this story that I read was a free version via Amazon Kindle. There were a lot of formatting issues – for instance, the letters that colored the latter half of the book were hard to follow at times because they’d break in weird places – and also quite a lot misspellings and also poor punctuation. At times, Jane was referred to as “Miss Bennet” which got a tad confusing because the book is narrated by Elizabeth and I couldn’t figure out why on earth she was calling her sister by that name, and there’s also the fact that there are five Miss Bennets. They also chose to emphasize words by using all caps, which I do myself and is okay in informal writing, but not okay in professional manuscripts. It got REALLY irritating to CONSTANTLY read a character’s emphasized thoughts in SUCH a horrid way. Etc. I feel like this diluted my enjoyment of the book; while I enjoy free, I should have gotten said free book via the library. There were also several instances of the name of the militia group being written as —-shire. Was that how it was in the book? It threw me every single time because I wanted to know what the heck the name of the shire was and couldn’t figure out why they wouldn’t just write it, or stop inserting the place name at all.

Okay, on to the story itself. I didn’t find Mr. Darcy charming in the slightest until over halfway through, when Elizabeth meets him at Pemberley. Likewise, Elizabeth grated on me with her refusal to ease up on her initial feelings toward Darcy (and yes, I KNOW that that was the point of this book – I get it, really! – but it still bothered me). I felt that steadfastly believing everything coming out of Wickham’s mouth just because you disliked the person he was talking about was a bit ridiculous; everything anyone says should be taken with a grain of salt, especially since no one is going to want to make you think badly of them. The only character I didn’t find any fault with was Jane, and that, too, was probably the point, although I will say that her even temper and ability to forgive and see good in everything was also a tad irritating, because I have not yet met a person who is anything like that. The characters that truly irritated me, however, were Mrs. Bennet and Lydia, both for the same reasons. They both lacked decorum and were horribly inappropriate throughout the book. Lydia’s elopement with Wickham could have ruined her family, but she didn’t care, and as soon as they were married, her mother – who had been lamenting the whole affair – had nothing but good to say to her. Lydia and Kitty both needed much firmer hands growing up, and I didn’t like the way the Bennets handled their upbringing. Mr. Bennet was nearly just as bad as his wife because he chose not to interfere. I have a real problem with people who don’t raise their children to have any kind of common sense and decency, which the youngest girls severely lacked.

Also, Mr. Darcy’s first proposal? OH MY. Elizabeth handled that much better than I would have done. How he could have even imagined that she would be okay with what was coming out of his mouth is beyond me. I have to admit, however, that I am a sucker for the “love can change a person” motif, and the fact that Elizabeth helped Darcy see his flaws is pretty darn attractive. Likewise, Mr. Bennet’s last letter to Mr. Collins was hysterical, I cheered when Elizabeth stood up to Lady Catherine, and Darcy’s second proposal was pretty much perfect. The latter half of the book was definitely better than the first part, mostly because I knew I was FINALLY getting to the part I wanted to read (i.e. when they all fall in love and live happily ever after). Darcy was much more charming in the last portion as well, which also helped my enjoyment, and Elizabeth had mellowed a bit and realized her failings as well, therefore not irritating me nearly as much.

Anyway, as I said above, I liked this book but didn’t think it was absolutely fantastic, and definitely didn’t love it. I am going to read Sense and Sensibility, though, so haven’t given up on Jane Austen completely, and if I feel the need to relive this story, I will just do so via the movie (although I am going to rent the BBC version as well, since I’ve also heard spectacular things about that).


This entry was posted in Reviews and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to REVIEW: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

  1. mmichelle says:


    Also, with the Miss Bennet thing – the eldest daughter in a family is Miss LastName, and the younger ones are Miss FirstName. So Jane is Miss Bennet, but Lizzie is just Miss Elizabeth, Mary is Miss Mary, etc. Now that Jane and Elizabeth are both married at the end of the book, Mary is the new Miss Bennet, and Kitty is still just Miss Kitty.

    And yes, the –shire thing is how it is in the book – I’ve noticed that not just in Austen, but in lots of books from this time period, and I’ve never quite understood it. But it’s pretty standard.

    I love P&P but it’s not actually my favorite Austen – Emma is my fave (she is such a brat, I love her), and I think Persuasion might tie with P&P, even though I feel like very few people have actually read Persuasion. Warning w Sense & Sensibility: I find one of the sisters in that really, really irritating. She’s a moron. She is not worthy of the man she ends up with, in my opinion. So be warned.

    Also yes, Mrs Bennet & Lydia are possibly two of the most annoying characters in literary history. I’ve always been mildly impressed with Austen for making them so annoying, because I’m pretty sure if I was writing the book I would have gotten so fed up with them that I wouldn’t have been able to stick with it hahaha.

  2. Right, I got that about Jane being Miss Bennet, but it was weird to hear her sister actually call her that, you know? And I am going to do “Sense and Sensibility” next because that’s the one I actually own, so it’s the most handy. I will probably read the others at some point as well, but not any time soon.

  3. mmichelle says:

    Yeah but…did Elizabeth actually SAY Miss Bennet in dialogue? Or is it just narrated as such? Because I mean even though the POV is largely Elizabeth’s, I feel like Austen has a tendency to kind of randomly go off on bits of omniscient narrator exposition.

    • She didn’t say it, but it was definitely her pov at that point. It was around the part where she wanted to speak with Darcy, but was stuck serving the tea, and the book said something like, “Miss Bennet was doing blahblah, while Elizabeth was blahblah,” and it had something right after about her feelings on just wanting to get close to Darcy. So in that case, it would have made more sense to just say Jane. But yes, I noticed the varying viewpoints throughout. Aside from the random mentions of Miss Bennet when Jane would have made more sense, I was able to overlook them.

  4. Yes, the BBC version is phenomenal and Colin Firth does an incredible Mr. Darcy. I do love P&P, but as for romance and character development I much prefer Jane Eyre. And yes, Mr. Bennet’s letter to Mr. Collins was hilarious, and the end of the book was wonderful. Hank Green (John Green’s brother) created the Lizzie Bennet Diaries, a Vlog series based on P&P, which is absolutely wonderful! You should go check it out– there’s also one for Emma, which was made beautifully as well.

Thanks for visiting! I love receiving comments and do my best to respond to all of them. However, due to time constraints, this blog is now an award and tag free zone. I really appreciate the thought, but just don't have the time to pass them on.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s